Everything about Continental Drift totally explained
Continental drift refers to the movement of the
Earth's
continents relative to each other. The hypothesis that continents 'drift' was first put forward by
Abraham Ortelius in 1596 and was fully developed by
Alfred Wegener in 1912. However, only with the development of the theory of
plate tectonics in the 1960s a sufficient
geological explanation of the cause of their movement could be found. (This article gives an overview about the development of the continental drift hypothesis before 1950. For the contemporary theory, see the article
plate tectonics.)
History
Early history
Abraham Ortelius (1596),
Francis Bacon (1620),
Benjamin Franklin,
Antonio Snider-Pellegrini (1858), and others had noted earlier that the shapes of
continents on either side of the
Atlantic Ocean (most notably, Africa and South America) seem to fit together. W. J. Kious described Ortelius' thoughts in this way:
Wegener and his predecessors
The hypothesis that the continents once formed a single landmass, broke up, and drifted to their present locations was fully elaborated by
Alfred Wegener in 1912.
Wegener himself said in 1929, that he wasn't the first to propose such an idea.
He mentioned the following predecessors:
Franklin Coxworthy (between 1848 and 1890),
Roberto Mantovani (between 1889 and 1909),
William Henry Pickering (1907)
and
Frank Bursley Taylor (1908). Wegener clearly stated that he created his theory independent of those authors. And it must be said that Wegener's theory was the most elaborated one.
For example: The similarity of southern continent geological formations had led
Roberto Mantovani to conjecture in 1889 and 1909 that all the continents had once been joined into a
supercontinent (now known as
Pangaea). (Regarding the former positions of the southern continents, Wegener himself also noted the similarity of Mantovani's and his own maps). Through
volcanic activity because of
thermal expansion this continent broke, whereby the new continents were drifting away from each other because of further expansion of the rip-zones, where now the oceans lie. However, this led Mantovani to propose an
expanding earth theory, which is now considered to be superseded.
Some sort of continental drift at constant earth radius was proposed by
Frank Bursley Taylor, who suggested in 1908 (published in 1910) that the continents were dragged towards the equator by increased lunar gravity during the
Cretaceous, thus forming the Himalaya and Alps on the southern faces. Wegener said that from all those theories, Taylor's theory (although not fully developed) had the most similarities to his own theory.
Wegener was the first to use the phrase "continental drift" (1912, 1915)
Controversial years
Wegener's hypothesis received support through the controversial years from
South African geologist
Alexander Du Toit as well as from
Arthur Holmes. The idea of continental drift didn't become widely accepted even as
theory until the late 1950s. By the 1960s, geological research conducted by
Robert S. Dietz,
Bruce Heezen, and
Harry Hess, along with a rekindling of the theory including a mechanism by
J. Tuzo Wilson led to widespread acceptance of the theory among geologists.
Evidence
Note: This section contains evidence available to Wegener's contemporaries and predecessors
The notion that continents have not always been at their present positions was suggested as early as 1596 by the Dutch map maker
Abraham Ortelius in the third edition of his work
Thesaurus Geographicus. Ortelius suggested that the Americas, Eurasia and Africa were once joined and have since drifted apart "by earthquakes and floods", creating the modern Atlantic Ocean. For evidence, he wrote: "The vestiges of the rupture reveal themselves, if someone brings forward a map of the world and considers carefully the coasts of the three continents."
Francis Bacon commented on Ortelius' idea in 1620, as did
Benjamin Franklin and
Alexander von Humboldt in later centuries.
Evidence for continental drift is now extensive, in the form of plant and animal
fossils of the same age found around different continent shores, suggesting that these shores were once joined: the fossils of the freshwater
crocodile, found in
Brazil and
South Africa, are one example. Another is the discovery of fossils of the aquatic
reptile Lystrosaurus from
rocks of the same age from locations in
South America,
Africa, and
Antarctica. There is also living evidence — the same animals being found on two continents. An example of this is a particular
earthworm found in South America and South Africa.
The complementary arrangement of the facing sides of South America and Africa is obvious, but is a temporary coincidence. In millions of years, seafloor spreading, continental drift, and other forces of
tectonophysics will further separate and rotate those two continents. It was this temporary feature which inspired Wegener to study what he defined as continental drift. He never lived to see his hypothesis be proven true.
Widespread distribution of
Permo-Carboniferous glacial sediments in South America, Africa, Madagascar, Arabia, India, Antarctica and Australia was one of the major pieces of evidence for the theory of continental drift. The continuity of glaciers, inferred from oriented glacial
striations and deposits called
tillites, suggested the existence of the supercontinent of
Gondwana, which became a central element of the concept of continental drift. Striations indicated glacial flow away from the equator and toward the poles, in modern coordinates, and was a good indicator of the fact that the southern continents had previously been in dramatically different locations, as well as contiguous with each other.
Debate
Before
geophysical evidence started accumulating after
World War II, the idea of continental drift caused sharp disagreement among geologists. Wegener had introduced his theory in 1912 at a meeting of the German Geological Association. His paper was published that year and expanded into a book in 1915. In 1921 the Berlin Geological Society held a symposium on the theory. In 1922 Wegener's book was translated into English and then it received a wider audience. In 1923 the theory was discussed at conferences by
Geological Society of France, the Geological Section of the
British Association for the Advancement of Science, and the
Royal Geological Society. The theory was carefully but critically reviewed in the journal
Nature by
Philip Lake. On
November 15,
1926, the
American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG) held a symposium at which the continental drift hypothesis was vigorously debated. The resulting papers were published in 1928 under the title
Theory of continental drift. Wegener himself contributed a paper to this volume.
One of the main problems with Wegener's theory was that he believed that the continents "plowed" through the rocks of the ocean basins. Most geologists didn't believe that this could be possible. In fact, the biggest objection to Wegener was that he didn't have an acceptable theory of the forces that
caused the continents to drift. He also ignored counter-arguments and evidence contrary to his theory and seemed too willing to interpret ambiguous evidence as being favorable to his theory. For their part, the geologists ignored Wegener's copious body of evidence, allowing their adherence to a
theory to override the actual
data, when the
scientific method would seem to demand the reverse approach.
Plate tectonics, a modern update of the old ideas of Wegener about "plowing" continents, accommodates continental motion through the mechanism of
seafloor spreading. New rock is created by volcanism at mid-ocean ridges and returned to the Earth's mantle at ocean trenches. Remarkably, in the 1928 AAPG volume,
G. A. F. Molengraaf of the Delft Institute (now
University) of Technology proposed a recognizable form of seafloor spreading in order to account for the opening of the
Atlantic Ocean as well as the
East Africa Rift. Arthur Holmes (an early supporter of Wegener) suggested that the movement of continents was the result of convection currents driven by the heat of the interior of the Earth, rather than the continents floating on the mantle. In the words of
Carl Sagan, it's more like the continents are being carried on a conveyor belt than floating or drifting. The ideas of Molengraaf and of Holmes led to the theory of plate tectonics, which replaced the theory of continental drift, and became the accepted theory in the 1960s (based on data that started to accumulate in the late 1950s).
However, acceptance was gradual. Nowadays it's universally supported; but even in 1977 a textbook could write the relatively weak: "a poll of geologists now would probably show a substantial majority who favor the idea of drift" and devote a section to a serious consideration of the objections to the theory.
Notes and references
Further Information
Get more info on 'Continental Drift'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://continental_drift.totallyexplained.com">Continental drift Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |
